EDITAR: Me doy cuenta de que mi respuesta no respondió exactamente la pregunta, aunque no hay una desventaja real, a partir de los resultados de mi tiempo tampoco hay una verdadera ventaja. La diferencia entre un captador de propiedades en línea es 0.002 segundos sobre 500 millones de iteraciones. Mi caso de prueba también puede no ser 100% exacto ya que está usando una estructura porque hay algunas advertencias sobre la inquietud y la alineación con las estructuras.
Como siempre, la única forma de saber realmente es escribir un examen y resolverlo. Aquí están mis resultados con la siguiente configuración:
Windows 7 Home
8GB ram
64bit os
i5-2300 2.8ghz
Proyecto vacío con la siguiente configuración:
.NET 4.5
Release mode
Start without debugger attached - CRUCIAL
Unchecked "Prefer 32-bit" under project build settings
Resultados
struct get property : 0.3097832 seconds
struct inline get property : 0.3079076 seconds
struct method call with params : 1.0925033 seconds
struct inline method call with params : 1.0930666 seconds
struct method call without params : 1.5211852 seconds
struct intline method call without params : 1.2235001 seconds
Probado con este código:
class Program
{
const int SAMPLES = 5;
const int ITERATIONS = 100000;
const int DATASIZE = 1000;
static Random random = new Random();
static Stopwatch timer = new Stopwatch();
static Dictionary<string, TimeSpan> timings = new Dictionary<string, TimeSpan>();
class SimpleTimer : IDisposable
{
private string name;
public SimpleTimer(string name)
{
this.name = name;
timer.Restart();
}
public void Dispose()
{
timer.Stop();
TimeSpan ts = TimeSpan.Zero;
if (timings.ContainsKey(name))
ts = timings[name];
ts += timer.Elapsed;
timings[name] = ts;
}
}
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 4)]
struct TestStruct
{
private int x;
public int X { get { return x; } set { x = value; } }
}
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 4)]
struct TestStruct2
{
private int x;
public int X
{
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
get { return x; }
set { x = value; }
}
}
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 8)]
struct TestStruct3
{
private int x;
private int y;
public void Update(int _x, int _y)
{
x += _x;
y += _y;
}
}
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 8)]
struct TestStruct4
{
private int x;
private int y;
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
public void Update(int _x, int _y)
{
x += _x;
y += _y;
}
}
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 8)]
struct TestStruct5
{
private int x;
private int y;
public void Update()
{
x *= x;
y *= y;
}
}
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 8)]
struct TestStruct6
{
private int x;
private int y;
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
public void Update()
{
x *= x;
y *= y;
}
}
static void RunTests()
{
for (var i = 0; i < SAMPLES; ++i)
{
Console.Write("Sample {0} ... ", i);
RunTest1();
RunTest2();
RunTest3();
RunTest4();
RunTest5();
RunTest6();
Console.WriteLine(" complate");
}
}
static int RunTest1()
{
var data = new TestStruct[DATASIZE];
var temp = 0;
unchecked
{
//init the data, just so jitter can't make assumptions
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
data[j].X = random.Next();
using (new SimpleTimer("struct get property"))
{
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
{
for (var i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; ++i)
{
//use some math to make sure its not optimized out (aka don't use an incrementor)
temp += data[j].X;
}
}
}
}
//again need variables to cross scopes to make sure the jitter doesn't do crazy optimizations
return temp;
}
static int RunTest2()
{
var data = new TestStruct2[DATASIZE];
var temp = 0;
unchecked
{
//init the data, just so jitter can't make assumptions
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
data[j].X = random.Next();
using (new SimpleTimer("struct inline get property"))
{
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
{
for (var i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; ++i)
{
//use some math to make sure its not optimized out (aka don't use an incrementor)
temp += data[j].X;
}
}
}
}
//again need variables to cross scopes to make sure the jitter doesn't do crazy optimizations
return temp;
}
static void RunTest3()
{
var data = new TestStruct3[DATASIZE];
unchecked
{
using (new SimpleTimer("struct method call with params"))
{
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
{
for (var i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; ++i)
{
//use some math to make sure its not optimized out (aka don't use an incrementor)
data[j].Update(j, i);
}
}
}
}
}
static void RunTest4()
{
var data = new TestStruct4[DATASIZE];
unchecked
{
using (new SimpleTimer("struct inline method call with params"))
{
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
{
for (var i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; ++i)
{
//use some math to make sure its not optimized out (aka don't use an incrementor)
data[j].Update(j, i);
}
}
}
}
}
static void RunTest5()
{
var data = new TestStruct5[DATASIZE];
unchecked
{
using (new SimpleTimer("struct method call without params"))
{
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
{
for (var i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; ++i)
{
//use some math to make sure its not optimized out (aka don't use an incrementor)
data[j].Update();
}
}
}
}
}
static void RunTest6()
{
var data = new TestStruct6[DATASIZE];
unchecked
{
using (new SimpleTimer("struct intline method call without params"))
{
for (var j = 0; j < DATASIZE; ++j)
{
for (var i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; ++i)
{
//use some math to make sure its not optimized out (aka don't use an incrementor)
data[j].Update();
}
}
}
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
RunTests();
DumpResults();
Console.Read();
}
static void DumpResults()
{
foreach (var kvp in timings)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0,-50}: {1} seconds", kvp.Key, kvp.Value.TotalSeconds);
}
}
}