Tengo un conjunto de enteros. Quiero encontrar la subsecuencia cada vez mayor de ese conjunto utilizando la programación dinámica.
Respuestas:
OK, describiré primero la solución más simple que es O (N ^ 2), donde N es el tamaño de la colección. También existe una solución O (N log N), que también describiré. Busque aquí en la sección Algoritmos eficientes.
Asumiré que los índices de la matriz son de 0 a N - 1. Así que definamos DP[i]la longitud del LIS (subsecuencia creciente más larga) que termina en el elemento con índice i. Para calcular DP[i]observamos todos los índices j < iy verificamos si DP[j] + 1 > DP[i]y array[j] < array[i](queremos que aumente). Si esto es cierto, podemos actualizar el óptimo actual para DP[i]. Para encontrar el óptimo global para la matriz, puede tomar el valor máximo de DP[0...N - 1].
int maxLength = 1, bestEnd = 0;
DP[0] = 1;
prev[0] = -1;
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++)
{
DP[i] = 1;
prev[i] = -1;
for (int j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--)
if (DP[j] + 1 > DP[i] && array[j] < array[i])
{
DP[i] = DP[j] + 1;
prev[i] = j;
}
if (DP[i] > maxLength)
{
bestEnd = i;
maxLength = DP[i];
}
}
Utilizo la matriz prevpara poder encontrar más tarde la secuencia real no solo su longitud. Simplemente regrese recursivamente desde bestEndun bucle usando prev[bestEnd]. El -1valor es una señal para detenerse.
O(N log N)solución más eficiente :Dejado S[pos]ser definido como el número entero más pequeño que termina una secuencia creciente de longitud pos. Ahora recorra cada número entero Xdel conjunto de entrada y haga lo siguiente:
Si X> último elemento en S, anexar Xal final de S. Esto significa esencialmente que hemos encontrado una nueva más grande LIS.
De lo contrario, encuentre el elemento más pequeño en S, que es >=que X, y cámbielo a X. Debido a que Sse ordena en cualquier momento, el elemento se puede encontrar mediante la búsqueda binaria en log(N).
Tiempo de ejecución total: Nenteros y una búsqueda binaria para cada uno de ellos: N * log (N) = O (N log N)
Ahora hagamos un ejemplo real:
Colección de enteros:
2 6 3 4 1 2 9 5 8
Pasos:
0. S = {} - Initialize S to the empty set
1. S = {2} - New largest LIS
2. S = {2, 6} - New largest LIS
3. S = {2, 3} - Changed 6 to 3
4. S = {2, 3, 4} - New largest LIS
5. S = {1, 3, 4} - Changed 2 to 1
6. S = {1, 2, 4} - Changed 3 to 2
7. S = {1, 2, 4, 9} - New largest LIS
8. S = {1, 2, 4, 5} - Changed 9 to 5
9. S = {1, 2, 4, 5, 8} - New largest LIS
Entonces, la longitud del LIS es 5(el tamaño de S).
Para reconstruir lo real LISusaremos nuevamente una matriz principal. Deje parent[i]ser el predecesor del elemento con índice ien la LISterminación en el elemento con índice i.
Para simplificar las cosas, podemos mantener en la matriz S, no los enteros reales, sino sus índices (posiciones) en el conjunto. No guardamos {1, 2, 4, 5, 8}, pero guardamos {4, 5, 3, 7, 8}.
Es decir, entrada [4] = 1 , entrada [5] = 2 , entrada [3] = 4 , entrada [7] = 5 , entrada [8] = 8 .
Si actualizamos correctamente la matriz principal, el LIS real es:
input[S[lastElementOfS]],
input[parent[S[lastElementOfS]]],
input[parent[parent[S[lastElementOfS]]]],
........................................
Ahora a lo importante: ¿cómo actualizamos la matriz principal? Hay dos opciones:
Si X> último elemento en S, entonces parent[indexX] = indexLastElement. Esto significa que el padre del elemento más nuevo es el último elemento. Simplemente anteponemos Xal final de S.
De lo contrario, encuentre el índice del elemento más pequeño en S, que es >=que X, y cámbielo a X. Aquí parent[indexX] = S[index - 1].
DP[j] + 1 == DP[i]entonces DP[i]no va a mejorar con DP[i] = DP[j] + 1. Estamos intentando optimizar DP[i].
[1,2,5,8], 4 viene antes que 1 en la matriz, ¿cómo puede ser el LIS [1,2,4,5,8]?
[2,3,4,5,8]. Lea atentamente: la Smatriz DOES NOTrepresenta una secuencia real. Let S[pos] be defined as the smallest integer that ends an increasing sequence of length pos.
La explicación de Petar Minchev me ayudó a aclarar las cosas, pero me resultó difícil analizar qué era todo, así que hice una implementación de Python con nombres de variables excesivamente descriptivos y muchos comentarios. Hice una solución recursiva ingenua, la solución O (n ^ 2) y la solución O (n log n).
¡Espero que ayude a aclarar los algoritmos!
def recursive_solution(remaining_sequence, bigger_than=None):
"""Finds the longest increasing subsequence of remaining_sequence that is
bigger than bigger_than and returns it. This solution is O(2^n)."""
# Base case: nothing is remaining.
if len(remaining_sequence) == 0:
return remaining_sequence
# Recursive case 1: exclude the current element and process the remaining.
best_sequence = recursive_solution(remaining_sequence[1:], bigger_than)
# Recursive case 2: include the current element if it's big enough.
first = remaining_sequence[0]
if (first > bigger_than) or (bigger_than is None):
sequence_with = [first] + recursive_solution(remaining_sequence[1:], first)
# Choose whichever of case 1 and case 2 were longer.
if len(sequence_with) >= len(best_sequence):
best_sequence = sequence_with
return best_sequence
def dynamic_programming_solution(sequence):
"""Finds the longest increasing subsequence in sequence using dynamic
programming. This solution is O(n^2)."""
longest_subsequence_ending_with = []
backreference_for_subsequence_ending_with = []
current_best_end = 0
for curr_elem in range(len(sequence)):
# It's always possible to have a subsequence of length 1.
longest_subsequence_ending_with.append(1)
# If a subsequence is length 1, it doesn't have a backreference.
backreference_for_subsequence_ending_with.append(None)
for prev_elem in range(curr_elem):
subsequence_length_through_prev = (longest_subsequence_ending_with[prev_elem] + 1)
# If the prev_elem is smaller than the current elem (so it's increasing)
# And if the longest subsequence from prev_elem would yield a better
# subsequence for curr_elem.
if ((sequence[prev_elem] < sequence[curr_elem]) and
(subsequence_length_through_prev >
longest_subsequence_ending_with[curr_elem])):
# Set the candidate best subsequence at curr_elem to go through prev.
longest_subsequence_ending_with[curr_elem] = (subsequence_length_through_prev)
backreference_for_subsequence_ending_with[curr_elem] = prev_elem
# If the new end is the best, update the best.
if (longest_subsequence_ending_with[curr_elem] >
longest_subsequence_ending_with[current_best_end]):
current_best_end = curr_elem
# Output the overall best by following the backreferences.
best_subsequence = []
current_backreference = current_best_end
while current_backreference is not None:
best_subsequence.append(sequence[current_backreference])
current_backreference = (backreference_for_subsequence_ending_with[current_backreference])
best_subsequence.reverse()
return best_subsequence
def find_smallest_elem_as_big_as(sequence, subsequence, elem):
"""Returns the index of the smallest element in subsequence as big as
sequence[elem]. sequence[elem] must not be larger than every element in
subsequence. The elements in subsequence are indices in sequence. Uses
binary search."""
low = 0
high = len(subsequence) - 1
while high > low:
mid = (high + low) / 2
# If the current element is not as big as elem, throw out the low half of
# sequence.
if sequence[subsequence[mid]] < sequence[elem]:
low = mid + 1
# If the current element is as big as elem, throw out everything bigger, but
# keep the current element.
else:
high = mid
return high
def optimized_dynamic_programming_solution(sequence):
"""Finds the longest increasing subsequence in sequence using dynamic
programming and binary search (per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_increasing_subsequence). This solution
is O(n log n)."""
# Both of these lists hold the indices of elements in sequence and not the
# elements themselves.
# This list will always be sorted.
smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length = []
# This array goes along with sequence (not
# smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length). Following the corresponding element
# in this array repeatedly will generate the desired subsequence.
parent = [None for _ in sequence]
for elem in range(len(sequence)):
# We're iterating through sequence in order, so if elem is bigger than the
# end of longest current subsequence, we have a new longest increasing
# subsequence.
if (len(smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length) == 0 or
sequence[elem] > sequence[smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length[-1]]):
# If we are adding the first element, it has no parent. Otherwise, we
# need to update the parent to be the previous biggest element.
if len(smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length) > 0:
parent[elem] = smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length[-1]
smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length.append(elem)
else:
# If we can't make a longer subsequence, we might be able to make a
# subsequence of equal size to one of our earlier subsequences with a
# smaller ending number (which makes it easier to find a later number that
# is increasing).
# Thus, we look for the smallest element in
# smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length that is at least as big as elem
# and replace it with elem.
# This preserves correctness because if there is a subsequence of length n
# that ends with a number smaller than elem, we could add elem on to the
# end of that subsequence to get a subsequence of length n+1.
location_to_replace = find_smallest_elem_as_big_as(sequence, smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length, elem)
smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length[location_to_replace] = elem
# If we're replacing the first element, we don't need to update its parent
# because a subsequence of length 1 has no parent. Otherwise, its parent
# is the subsequence one shorter, which we just added onto.
if location_to_replace != 0:
parent[elem] = (smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length[location_to_replace - 1])
# Generate the longest increasing subsequence by backtracking through parent.
curr_parent = smallest_end_to_subsequence_of_length[-1]
longest_increasing_subsequence = []
while curr_parent is not None:
longest_increasing_subsequence.append(sequence[curr_parent])
curr_parent = parent[curr_parent]
longest_increasing_subsequence.reverse()
return longest_increasing_subsequence
bisect. Para una demostración de cómo funciona un algoritmo y sus características de rendimiento, estaba tratando de mantener las cosas lo más primitivas posible.
Hablando de la solución DP, me pareció sorprendente que nadie mencionara el hecho de que LIS puede reducirse a LCS . Todo lo que necesita hacer es ordenar la copia de la secuencia original, eliminar todos los duplicados y hacer LCS de ellos. En pseudocódigo es:
def LIS(S):
T = sort(S)
T = removeDuplicates(T)
return LCS(S, T)
Y la implementación completa escrita en Go. No necesita mantener toda la matriz n ^ 2 DP si no necesita reconstruir la solución.
func lcs(arr1 []int) int {
arr2 := make([]int, len(arr1))
for i, v := range arr1 {
arr2[i] = v
}
sort.Ints(arr1)
arr3 := []int{}
prev := arr1[0] - 1
for _, v := range arr1 {
if v != prev {
prev = v
arr3 = append(arr3, v)
}
}
n1, n2 := len(arr1), len(arr3)
M := make([][]int, n2 + 1)
e := make([]int, (n1 + 1) * (n2 + 1))
for i := range M {
M[i] = e[i * (n1 + 1):(i + 1) * (n1 + 1)]
}
for i := 1; i <= n2; i++ {
for j := 1; j <= n1; j++ {
if arr2[j - 1] == arr3[i - 1] {
M[i][j] = M[i - 1][j - 1] + 1
} else if M[i - 1][j] > M[i][j - 1] {
M[i][j] = M[i - 1][j]
} else {
M[i][j] = M[i][j - 1]
}
}
}
return M[n2][n1]
}
La siguiente implementación de C ++ incluye también algo de código que construye la subsecuencia creciente más larga real usando una matriz llamada prev.
std::vector<int> longest_increasing_subsequence (const std::vector<int>& s)
{
int best_end = 0;
int sz = s.size();
if (!sz)
return std::vector<int>();
std::vector<int> prev(sz,-1);
std::vector<int> memo(sz, 0);
int max_length = std::numeric_limits<int>::min();
memo[0] = 1;
for ( auto i = 1; i < sz; ++i)
{
for ( auto j = 0; j < i; ++j)
{
if ( s[j] < s[i] && memo[i] < memo[j] + 1 )
{
memo[i] = memo[j] + 1;
prev[i] = j;
}
}
if ( memo[i] > max_length )
{
best_end = i;
max_length = memo[i];
}
}
// Code that builds the longest increasing subsequence using "prev"
std::vector<int> results;
results.reserve(sz);
std::stack<int> stk;
int current = best_end;
while (current != -1)
{
stk.push(s[current]);
current = prev[current];
}
while (!stk.empty())
{
results.push_back(stk.top());
stk.pop();
}
return results;
}
La implementación sin pila simplemente invierte el vector
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <limits>
std::vector<int> LIS( const std::vector<int> &v ) {
auto sz = v.size();
if(!sz)
return v;
std::vector<int> memo(sz, 0);
std::vector<int> prev(sz, -1);
memo[0] = 1;
int best_end = 0;
int max_length = std::numeric_limits<int>::min();
for (auto i = 1; i < sz; ++i) {
for ( auto j = 0; j < i ; ++j) {
if (s[j] < s[i] && memo[i] < memo[j] + 1) {
memo[i] = memo[j] + 1;
prev[i] = j;
}
}
if(memo[i] > max_length) {
best_end = i;
max_length = memo[i];
}
}
// create results
std::vector<int> results;
results.reserve(v.size());
auto current = best_end;
while (current != -1) {
results.push_back(s[current]);
current = prev[current];
}
std::reverse(results.begin(), results.end());
return results;
}
Aquí hay tres pasos para evaluar el problema desde el punto de vista de la programación dinámica:
Si tomamos como ejemplo la secuencia {0, 8, 2, 3, 7, 9}, en el índice:
Aquí está el código de trabajo de C ++ 11:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
int getLongestIncSub(const std::vector<int> &sequence, size_t index, std::vector<std::vector<int>> &sub) {
if(index == 0) {
sub.push_back(std::vector<int>{sequence[0]});
return 1;
}
size_t longestSubSeq = getLongestIncSub(sequence, index - 1, sub);
std::vector<std::vector<int>> tmpSubSeq;
for(std::vector<int> &subSeq : sub) {
if(subSeq[subSeq.size() - 1] < sequence[index]) {
std::vector<int> newSeq(subSeq);
newSeq.push_back(sequence[index]);
longestSubSeq = std::max(longestSubSeq, newSeq.size());
tmpSubSeq.push_back(newSeq);
}
}
std::copy(tmpSubSeq.begin(), tmpSubSeq.end(),
std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<std::vector<int>>>(sub));
return longestSubSeq;
}
int getLongestIncSub(const std::vector<int> &sequence) {
std::vector<std::vector<int>> sub;
return getLongestIncSub(sequence, sequence.size() - 1, sub);
}
int main()
{
std::vector<int> seq{0, 8, 2, 3, 7, 9};
std::cout << getLongestIncSub(seq);
return 0;
}
Aquí hay una implementación Scala del algoritmo O (n ^ 2):
object Solve {
def longestIncrSubseq[T](xs: List[T])(implicit ord: Ordering[T]) = {
xs.foldLeft(List[(Int, List[T])]()) {
(sofar, x) =>
if (sofar.isEmpty) List((1, List(x)))
else {
val resIfEndsAtCurr = (sofar, xs).zipped map {
(tp, y) =>
val len = tp._1
val seq = tp._2
if (ord.lteq(y, x)) {
(len + 1, x :: seq) // reversely recorded to avoid O(n)
} else {
(1, List(x))
}
}
sofar :+ resIfEndsAtCurr.maxBy(_._1)
}
}.maxBy(_._1)._2.reverse
}
def main(args: Array[String]) = {
println(longestIncrSubseq(List(
0, 8, 4, 12, 2, 10, 6, 14, 1, 9, 5, 13, 3, 11, 7, 15)))
}
}
Aquí hay otra implementación O (n ^ 2) JAVA. Sin recursión / memorización para generar la subsecuencia real. Solo una matriz de cadenas que almacena el LIS real en cada etapa y una matriz para almacenar la longitud del LIS para cada elemento. Bastante fácil. Echar un vistazo:
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
/**
* Created by Shreyans on 4/16/2015
*/
class LNG_INC_SUB//Longest Increasing Subsequence
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
{
BufferedReader br=new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("Enter Numbers Separated by Spaces to find their LIS\n");
String[] s1=br.readLine().split(" ");
int n=s1.length;
int[] a=new int[n];//Array actual of Numbers
String []ls=new String[n];// Array of Strings to maintain LIS for every element
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
{
a[i]=Integer.parseInt(s1[i]);
}
int[]dp=new int[n];//Storing length of max subseq.
int max=dp[0]=1;//Defaults
String seq=ls[0]=s1[0];//Defaults
for(int i=1;i<n;i++)
{
dp[i]=1;
String x="";
for(int j=i-1;j>=0;j--)
{
//First check if number at index j is less than num at i.
// Second the length of that DP should be greater than dp[i]
// -1 since dp of previous could also be one. So we compare the dp[i] as empty initially
if(a[j]<a[i]&&dp[j]>dp[i]-1)
{
dp[i]=dp[j]+1;//Assigning temp length of LIS. There may come along a bigger LIS of a future a[j]
x=ls[j];//Assigning temp LIS of a[j]. Will append a[i] later on
}
}
x+=(" "+a[i]);
ls[i]=x;
if(dp[i]>max)
{
max=dp[i];
seq=ls[i];
}
}
System.out.println("Length of LIS is: " + max + "\nThe Sequence is: " + seq);
}
}
Código en acción: http://ideone.com/sBiOQx
Esto se puede resolver en O (n ^ 2) utilizando la programación dinámica. El código de Python para el mismo sería como: -
def LIS(numlist):
LS = [1]
for i in range(1, len(numlist)):
LS.append(1)
for j in range(0, i):
if numlist[i] > numlist[j] and LS[i]<=LS[j]:
LS[i] = 1 + LS[j]
print LS
return max(LS)
numlist = map(int, raw_input().split(' '))
print LIS(numlist)
Para entrada:5 19 5 81 50 28 29 1 83 23
la salida sería:[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 3, 4, 1, 5, 3]
5
El list_index de output list es list_index de input list. El valor en un índice_de_lista dado en la lista de salida denota la mayor longitud de subsecuencia creciente para ese índice_de_lista.
aquí está la implementación de Java O (nlogn)
import java.util.Scanner;
public class LongestIncreasingSeq {
private static int binarySearch(int table[],int a,int len){
int end = len-1;
int beg = 0;
int mid = 0;
int result = -1;
while(beg <= end){
mid = (end + beg) / 2;
if(table[mid] < a){
beg=mid+1;
result = mid;
}else if(table[mid] == a){
return len-1;
}else{
end = mid-1;
}
}
return result;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// int[] t = {1, 2, 5,9,16};
// System.out.println(binarySearch(t , 9, 5));
Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
int size = in.nextInt();//4;
int A[] = new int[size];
int table[] = new int[A.length];
int k = 0;
while(k<size){
A[k++] = in.nextInt();
if(k<size-1)
in.nextLine();
}
table[0] = A[0];
int len = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < A.length; i++) {
if(table[0] > A[i]){
table[0] = A[i];
}else if(table[len-1]<A[i]){
table[len++]=A[i];
}else{
table[binarySearch(table, A[i],len)+1] = A[i];
}
}
System.out.println(len);
}
}
Esta es una implementación de Java en O (n ^ 2). Simplemente no utilicé la Búsqueda binaria para encontrar el elemento más pequeño en S, que es> = que X. Solo utilicé un bucle for. El uso de la búsqueda binaria haría que la complejidad en O (n logn)
public static void olis(int[] seq){
int[] memo = new int[seq.length];
memo[0] = seq[0];
int pos = 0;
for (int i=1; i<seq.length; i++){
int x = seq[i];
if (memo[pos] < x){
pos++;
memo[pos] = x;
} else {
for(int j=0; j<=pos; j++){
if (memo[j] >= x){
memo[j] = x;
break;
}
}
}
//just to print every step
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(memo));
}
//the final array with the LIS
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(memo));
System.out.println("The length of lis is " + (pos + 1));
}
verifique el código en Java para la subsecuencia creciente más larga con los elementos de la matriz
/**
** Java Program to implement Longest Increasing Subsequence Algorithm
**/
import java.util.Scanner;
/** Class LongestIncreasingSubsequence **/
class LongestIncreasingSubsequence
{
/** function lis **/
public int[] lis(int[] X)
{
int n = X.length - 1;
int[] M = new int[n + 1];
int[] P = new int[n + 1];
int L = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < n + 1; i++)
{
int j = 0;
/** Linear search applied here. Binary Search can be applied too.
binary search for the largest positive j <= L such that
X[M[j]] < X[i] (or set j = 0 if no such value exists) **/
for (int pos = L ; pos >= 1; pos--)
{
if (X[M[pos]] < X[i])
{
j = pos;
break;
}
}
P[i] = M[j];
if (j == L || X[i] < X[M[j + 1]])
{
M[j + 1] = i;
L = Math.max(L,j + 1);
}
}
/** backtrack **/
int[] result = new int[L];
int pos = M[L];
for (int i = L - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
result[i] = X[pos];
pos = P[pos];
}
return result;
}
/** Main Function **/
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Scanner scan = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println("Longest Increasing Subsequence Algorithm Test\n");
System.out.println("Enter number of elements");
int n = scan.nextInt();
int[] arr = new int[n + 1];
System.out.println("\nEnter "+ n +" elements");
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
arr[i] = scan.nextInt();
LongestIncreasingSubsequence obj = new LongestIncreasingSubsequence();
int[] result = obj.lis(arr);
/** print result **/
System.out.print("\nLongest Increasing Subsequence : ");
for (int i = 0; i < result.length; i++)
System.out.print(result[i] +" ");
System.out.println();
}
}
Esto se puede resolver en O (n ^ 2) usando programación dinámica.
Procese los elementos de entrada en orden y mantenga una lista de tuplas para cada elemento. Cada tupla (A, B), para el elemento i denotará, A = longitud de la subsecuencia creciente más larga que termina en i y B = índice del predecesor de la lista [i] en la subsecuencia creciente más larga que termina en la lista [i ]
Comience desde el elemento 1, la lista de tuplas para el elemento 1 será [(1,0)] para el elemento i, escanee la lista 0..i y encuentre la lista de elementos [k] tal que la lista [k] <lista [i] , el valor de A para el elemento i, Ai será Ak + 1 y Bi será k. Si hay varios de estos elementos, agréguelos a la lista de tuplas para el elemento i.
Al final, encuentre todos los elementos con el valor máximo de A (longitud de LIS que termina en el elemento) y retroceda utilizando las tuplas para obtener la lista.
He compartido el código para el mismo en http://www.edufyme.com/code/?id=66f041e16a60928b05a7e228a89c3799
O (n ^ 2) implementación de Java:
void LIS(int arr[]){
int maxCount[]=new int[arr.length];
int link[]=new int[arr.length];
int maxI=0;
link[0]=0;
maxCount[0]=0;
for (int i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if(arr[j]<arr[i] && ((maxCount[j]+1)>maxCount[i])){
maxCount[i]=maxCount[j]+1;
link[i]=j;
if(maxCount[i]>maxCount[maxI]){
maxI=i;
}
}
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < link.length; i++) {
System.out.println(arr[i]+" "+link[i]);
}
print(arr,maxI,link);
}
void print(int arr[],int index,int link[]){
if(link[index]==index){
System.out.println(arr[index]+" ");
return;
}else{
print(arr, link[index], link);
System.out.println(arr[index]+" ");
}
}
def longestincrsub(arr1):
n=len(arr1)
l=[1]*n
for i in range(0,n):
for j in range(0,i) :
if arr1[j]<arr1[i] and l[i]<l[j] + 1:
l[i] =l[j] + 1
l.sort()
return l[-1]
arr1=[10,22,9,33,21,50,41,60]
a=longestincrsub(arr1)
print(a)
a pesar de que hay una manera de resolver esto en tiempo O (nlogn) (esto resuelve en tiempo O (n ^ 2)) pero de esta manera se obtiene el enfoque de programación dinámica que también es bueno.
Aquí está mi solución de Leetcode usando Búsqueda binaria: ->
class Solution:
def binary_search(self,s,x):
low=0
high=len(s)-1
flag=1
while low<=high:
mid=(high+low)//2
if s[mid]==x:
flag=0
break
elif s[mid]<x:
low=mid+1
else:
high=mid-1
if flag:
s[low]=x
return s
def lengthOfLIS(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
if not nums:
return 0
s=[]
s.append(nums[0])
for i in range(1,len(nums)):
if s[-1]<nums[i]:
s.append(nums[i])
else:
s=self.binary_search(s,nums[i])
return len(s)
#include <iostream>
#include "vector"
using namespace std;
// binary search (If value not found then it will return the index where the value should be inserted)
int ceilBinarySearch(vector<int> &a,int beg,int end,int value)
{
if(beg<=end)
{
int mid = (beg+end)/2;
if(a[mid] == value)
return mid;
else if(value < a[mid])
return ceilBinarySearch(a,beg,mid-1,value);
else
return ceilBinarySearch(a,mid+1,end,value);
return 0;
}
return beg;
}
int lis(vector<int> arr)
{
vector<int> dp(arr.size(),0);
int len = 0;
for(int i = 0;i<arr.size();i++)
{
int j = ceilBinarySearch(dp,0,len-1,arr[i]);
dp[j] = arr[i];
if(j == len)
len++;
}
return len;
}
int main()
{
vector<int> arr {2, 5,-1,0,6,1,2};
cout<<lis(arr);
return 0;
}
SALIDA:
4
Subsecuencia creciente más larga (Java)
import java.util.*;
class ChainHighestValue implements Comparable<ChainHighestValue>{
int highestValue;
int chainLength;
ChainHighestValue(int highestValue,int chainLength) {
this.highestValue = highestValue;
this.chainLength = chainLength;
}
@Override
public int compareTo(ChainHighestValue o) {
return this.chainLength-o.chainLength;
}
}
public class LongestIncreasingSubsequenceLinkedList {
private static LinkedList<Integer> LongestSubsequent(int arr[], int size){
ArrayList<LinkedList<Integer>> seqList=new ArrayList<>();
ArrayList<ChainHighestValue> valuePairs=new ArrayList<>();
for(int i=0;i<size;i++){
int currValue=arr[i];
if(valuePairs.size()==0){
LinkedList<Integer> aList=new LinkedList<>();
aList.add(arr[i]);
seqList.add(aList);
valuePairs.add(new ChainHighestValue(arr[i],1));
}else{
try{
ChainHighestValue heighestIndex=valuePairs.stream().filter(e->e.highestValue<currValue).max(ChainHighestValue::compareTo).get();
int index=valuePairs.indexOf(heighestIndex);
seqList.get(index).add(arr[i]);
heighestIndex.highestValue=arr[i];
heighestIndex.chainLength+=1;
}catch (Exception e){
LinkedList<Integer> aList=new LinkedList<>();
aList.add(arr[i]);
seqList.add(aList);
valuePairs.add(new ChainHighestValue(arr[i],1));
}
}
}
ChainHighestValue heighestIndex=valuePairs.stream().max(ChainHighestValue::compareTo).get();
int index=valuePairs.indexOf(heighestIndex);
return seqList.get(index);
}
public static void main(String[] args){
int arry[]={5,1,3,6,11,30,32,5,3,73,79};
//int arryB[]={3,1,5,2,6,4,9};
LinkedList<Integer> LIS=LongestSubsequent(arry, arry.length);
System.out.println("Longest Incrementing Subsequence:");
for(Integer a: LIS){
System.out.print(a+" ");
}
}
}
He implementado LIS en Java usando programación dinámica y memorización. Junto con el código, he realizado cálculos de complejidad, es decir, por qué es O (n Log (base2) n). Como siento, las explicaciones teóricas o lógicas son buenas, pero la demostración práctica siempre es mejor para comprender.
package com.company.dynamicProgramming;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class LongestIncreasingSequence {
static int complexity = 0;
public static void main(String ...args){
int[] arr = {10, 22, 9, 33, 21, 50, 41, 60, 80};
int n = arr.length;
Map<Integer, Integer> memo = new HashMap<>();
lis(arr, n, memo);
//Display Code Begins
int x = 0;
System.out.format("Longest Increasing Sub-Sequence with size %S is -> ",memo.get(n));
for(Map.Entry e : memo.entrySet()){
if((Integer)e.getValue() > x){
System.out.print(arr[(Integer)e.getKey()-1] + " ");
x++;
}
}
System.out.format("%nAnd Time Complexity for Array size %S is just %S ", arr.length, complexity );
System.out.format( "%nWhich is equivalent to O(n Log n) i.e. %SLog(base2)%S is %S",arr.length,arr.length, arr.length * Math.ceil(Math.log(arr.length)/Math.log(2)));
//Display Code Ends
}
static int lis(int[] arr, int n, Map<Integer, Integer> memo){
if(n==1){
memo.put(1, 1);
return 1;
}
int lisAti;
int lisAtn = 1;
for(int i = 1; i < n; i++){
complexity++;
if(memo.get(i)!=null){
lisAti = memo.get(i);
}else {
lisAti = lis(arr, i, memo);
}
if(arr[i-1] < arr[n-1] && lisAti +1 > lisAtn){
lisAtn = lisAti +1;
}
}
memo.put(n, lisAtn);
return lisAtn;
}
}
Mientras ejecutaba el código anterior,
Longest Increasing Sub-Sequence with size 6 is -> 10 22 33 50 60 80
And Time Complexity for Array size 9 is just 36
Which is equivalent to O(n Log n) i.e. 9Log(base2)9 is 36.0
Process finished with exit code 0